In the 21st Century, most of our job growth will be in highly technical, sophisticated fields that offer good salaries and health benefits.
Currently, however, not enough Georgians over the age of 25 have completed college or technical school. As a result, many Georgians lack the skills they need to take advantage of the kinds of good jobs that the new economy provides. We need to transform our workforce, and we need leaders who are willing to assist in this transformation without getting in the way.
Although control of public education rests with state governments and local school boards, the federal government has an important role in ensuring that all American children have access to quality education. The federal government can help the most by providing early childhood education for children who need help, by supporting school systems in their efforts to achieve excellence, by assisting children with special needs, and by working with struggling school systems to get them back on track.
Creating incentives for schools to be successful is the right idea, but micromanaging the classroom is not going to train our students to be successful in the new economy. Our best schools have high standards, but do not waste valuable resources constantly demonstrating their competence. Parents and teachers are better at setting standards in their own communities than any bureaucrat in Washington or Atlanta.
We know that early intervention works best. The federal government has played an important role in early childhood development and should do more. We should expand Head Start eligibility to include more at-risk children, and we should expand the Early Head Start Program. Studies have shown that early intervention can go a long way toward ensuring academic success in K-12 education, in turn lowering high school dropout rates and creating more opportunities for our young people.
But our commitment to education cannot end after high school. Only 55 percent of Georgia's high school graduates who are ready for college or technical school actually attend, and too many of them have to drop out for financial reasons once they get there. We must expand the federal loan and grant programs to make sure that cost is not a barrier to a college degree.
Creating a culture of higher education and lifetime learning will be the most important investment that we can make in the future of our state and our country. A strong education system - from early childhood through college and technical school - will allow the United States to compete effectively in the global economy.
I believe that this is perhaps the critical issue facing our nation. The education of a child is an investment which takes 20-25 years to pay off but the converse is if we neglect this now, then in 20-25 years we will pay a severe penalty.
When we divert money from schools to pay for the war in Iraq, we need to ask ourselves this. Would we want our brave men and women in the military to be outfitted with the very best cutting edge technology to give them every advantage on the battle field or would we prefer that they use out dated technology and go up against an enemy with technical superiority. Now ask yourself what country will have that technical superiority in 25-30 years if our country does not place a huge priority on the education of our children like many developing (and many hostile) nations do.
When we fail to regulate multi-billion dollar, multi-national corporations and allow corporate corruption to become a tax payer bail out instead of spending money on our schools, we need to ask ourselves this. How many other countries are placing a high value on technical education today? How many other countries are spending huge amounts of money to build world class high tech research programs that compete with our best universities today? This is not theoretical. A very well known engineering professor from UCLA has recently left to build a research group at a new university in his native Pakistan. Given the achievements of this individual, I have no doubt that they will have a high tech research program that rivals the best in this country.
Now ask what country will be the technology leader in 25 years and what country will be lagging behind economically as a result.
Education is a national security issue both economically and militarily and we had better start treating it like one now.
Dan on October 27, 2008 8:45 PM
I've heard that Mr. Chambliss has proposed to maximize classroom size in public schools to save money? How do you feel about this? I personnally am completely against it. Even though I live in a very small town (Willacoochee, GA) and we maybe have 600 students at the elementry school, I think that 18-20 kids in a classroom is enough!I have a child in Kindergarten. How will my child's education suffer from maximizing classroom size? How are kids on different learning levels going to learn if there are 25+ kids in one room and you have some that are on a lower level, some average, and some on a higher level? With that many kids per classroom, you can't take out time to do one-on-one with the students that need it. There would be kids from every learning level that will suffer from this. I understand that the econmomy is in a bad condition right now and who knows for how long. But don't you think it will stay this way for the future generations that are in school now that would be deprived from a better education if there are too many kids in a classroom. If there are so many kids in a room how can a teacher find every student that has a problem? How many Georgia kids will slip through the cracks if this happens??? Thank you in advance for any information and letting the people know you views and opinions on this issue.
Kayla Whitley on October 22, 2008 12:42 PM